Circuit-Accurate Legal Standard Sections for Litigation Motions
Asked Jun 27, 2026Modified 4 days agoViewed 6 timesWorks with: GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Claude 3.7 Sonnet
0
What this prompt does
Acts as a senior litigation associate to draft only the governing legal standard section of any motion, with Bluebook citations and circuit-specific authority built in.
- Compatible models:
- GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- Category:
- Writing
Acts as a senior litigation associate to draft only the governing legal standard section of any motion, with Bluebook citations and circuit-specific authority built in. Use it when you need a citation-ready foundation before adding your fact-specific arguments.
Act as a senior litigation associate. Draft the 'Legal Standard' section for a [Motion Type, e.g., Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim] pursuant to [Specific Rule, e.g., FRCP 12(b)(6)].
Jurisdiction: [Specify Court, e.g., Southern District of New York]
Governing Authority: Focus on the standard established by [e.g., Twombly and Iqbal] and relevant circuit-specific precedents regarding the 'plausibility' requirement.
Requirements:
* Provide a concise, neutral statement of the burden of proof.
* Include the standard for how the court must treat well-pleaded factual allegations vs. legal conclusions.
* Format citations in [Bluebook/Local Rule] style.
* Do not draft a 'Statement of Facts' or 'Argument' section. Do not attempt to apply the law to specific facts. Provide only the governing legal framework.
Source: https://spellbook.com/learn/chatgpt-prompts-for-lawyers
Prompt Curator
120rep · asked Jun 27, 2026
0 Responses
Want to respond? Log in.